See I liked the MOTW (Mystery of the Week). Thought it was a clever spin on the Rumplestiltskin tale, how people hide their identities/motivations/true natures and the foreshadowing of what happens when you can't hide in the shadows anymore (like basically the entire cast did during season 1). Names are important in GRIMM. They denote origin, identity, power, & purpose. Renard's discovery of the list of names parallels how the main characters are becoming more aware of each other's purpose and abilities in this chess game. They're having more scenes together, bantering, & relationships are gelling - while they may not trust each other completely, it's not making them weaker. Excellent episode IMO.
Good episode wrt Nick & the entire team interacting. But, as far as the WOTW (Wesen of the Week), it's clear the writers just wanted to do something disgusting and didn't really think it out very well. How many South Africans emigrate within a week to Portland and don't end up leaving a trail of parasites along the way? SERIOUSLY? Were his headaches ever addressed? And, surely there would have been high media coverage of such a sickening trail of attacks in South Africa leaving victims *without eyes.* IMO, there would have been an int'l hunt for such an attacker long before he showed up on U.S. soil & Grimms in Africa should have taken care of him long ago.
I would have been more impressed with this episode if the case had actually been solved. Yet, the audience was left with the very same question that we had at the beginning - WHAT HAPPENED TO THE WIFE? We know what happened to the subway victim and the motive for the crime - she was a red herring. Still, as far as I could see - no body for the wife, no physical evidence linking the husband to anything other than his wife's email account. And, you know what...some spouses may actually do a lot with each other's accounts. So, it's not really a slam dunk there. Yes, the Watson character stuff was good; and Sherlock is a really good mentor. But, the crime of the week was not solved well IMO.
@tjharrison - How much life experience do you have, tj? There are plenty of women who can afford an escort for hire, especially in NYC. If Brody isn't gay, what makes you think he would want to make money on the side servicing men? He would do what he's best at - dancing with the ladies, and charming the pants/dresses off them.
@Roseanne - Once characters receive their Happy Ending, they are shelved for storytelling purposes. Witness Hansel & Gretel (found dad), Cinderella (married her prince), Jefferson/Mad Hatter (reunited with his daughter), Pinocchio & Geppetto, etc. In Storybrooke, Kathryn's last scene was meeting the gym teacher/Frederick in the school hallway while looking for Mary Margaret. I took that to mean that they were on their way to their Happy Ending. Hook was much better incorporated into the series that Aurora & Mulan, IMO. Those two are still wandering around the Enchanted Forest looking for Philip. Their actions don't impact Storybrooke at all. Once Snow & Emma left that place, we didn't really care about what happened to them. I hope it's a lesson to the writers that you just can't throw anyone into the series because the fans want them. There needs to a good reason & motivation for every character to be present. The whole Owen/Tamara/Neal mystery better be worth it.
Just because Pinocchio is back to being a boy doesn't mean August is gone from our screens. There is major backstory about how August even knew where to find Bae/Neal after all of Bae's years spent somewhere else. We know that August was instrumental in getting Neal to abandon Emma about 11 years ago (before Henry's birth). But, does anyone think it's pure coincidence that the son of the Dark One and the daughter of Snow & Charming just happened to meet & make a baby? Uh, no...and August probably knows the answer to how that went down more than anyone. Plus, there's that ever present question about the book. WHO WROTE THE DARN BOOK OF FAIRY TALES in the first place? August knows, and it needs to be shown. So, we'll see him again.
"I think Tamara may be Pocahontas if she were to be a fairytale character..." Nope, because Pocahontas has never been a fairytale character. She was a real person, along with John Smith and John Rolfe, and is actually buried in England. The creators have been quite adamant that only fictional characters need apply, and Poca is too "real" to bring her into OUAT. I think Tamara could be either Tiana ("The Princess and the Frog"), Tiger Lily (from Neverland), or Tinker Bell. The theory that she's related to the Cinderella's murdered fairy godmother is interesting. But, how would a human have connections to the Enchanted Forest? Then again, the whole "magic is not in this world" thing seems to be falling apart with each new episode.
PART II (from below)...But, it's the adults around him who are responsible for making him feel safe. It's not his job to understand nuance. It's their job to teach him, and they are all quite ill-equipped to do so. Rumple, Snow, Emma, and Regina are all so emotionally stunted, they are not much more than children themselves in that area. Charming, Neal and August may be more mature and could help Henry in this area. But, unfortunately, it's the moms/grandmothers who are facing off and wallowing in the drama instead of making Henry feel safe.
Many of the comments about Henry seem to lack a certain, shall we say, parental understanding. If all of them are from people who don't have kids, that's understandable. I have children. Henry is acting like a typical 10-year-old/5th grade kid. So, you people have quite a road ahead if you don't have children yet. Children younger than Henry are very savvy, smart and challenge authority because that's what they are SUPPOSED TO DO. It's called getting ready to leave the nest. Of course, what is never pointed out on OUAT (and should be), and in reviews, is what LOUSY PARENTS most of the adult characters are because they didn't have good role models themselves. They grew up in a world where blended families really didn't exist. So, it's an either/or proposition about who Henry will live with. It could be both. But, not for them because that's their only experience. Henry is frustrated. But, it's the adults around him who are responsible for making him feel safe. It's not his job to understand nuance. It's their job to teach him, and they are all ill-equipped to do so.
Oh, for goodness' sake! Why does Alicia need to commit to anyone? Why can't she be like Diane, and be single when the election is done? I think the series title, "The Good Wife", subconsciously makes people pigeonhole Alicia into someone who *has* to make a choice between two men. The lady is an adult. If she doesn't want a committed relationship, and enjoys sex without strings, there is nothing wrong with that. Men do it all the time. Diane does it and no one debates about whether it's right or wrong, if she's "committed" or "in love", or describes her as a horny teenager.
Sign up for our
and receive the latest tv news delivered to your inbox for
© 2014 TV Fanatic
Sign up for our daily newsletter to receive personalized television news for